<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decalogue 4 (Honor thy Father and Mother) (1989), Krzysztof Kieslowski, B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jordanhoffman.com/2007/05/12/decalogue-4-honor-thy-father-and-mother-1989-krzysztof-kieslowski-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jordanhoffman.com/2007/05/12/decalogue-4-honor-thy-father-and-mother-1989-krzysztof-kieslowski-b/</link>
	<description>Sympathy For Lots-o-Huggin&#039; Bear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:46:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: e. nassar</title>
		<link>http://jordanhoffman.com/2007/05/12/decalogue-4-honor-thy-father-and-mother-1989-krzysztof-kieslowski-b/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>e. nassar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 04:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jordanhoffman.com/2007/05/12/decalogue-4-honor-thy-father-and-mother-1989-krzysztof-kieslowski-b/#comment-764</guid>
		<description>&quot; obtuse, inscrutable storytelling for twenty minutes, til you just can’t take it anymore, and then the planets line up and a recognizable conflict is presented&quot;

 

Very well  put. I like that about his films (not just the Decalogue). The way I see it you are thrown in the middle of a story and nothing is explained, not even who&#039;s who exactly. You sort of have to piece it together. That&#039;s why it seems so confusing and uneven at first. Maybe he assumes his viewers are smarter than average (as opposed to a CSI episode where everything the characters are doing is explained by...them)?

 

P.S. nothing against CSI, I actually like the show, it&#039;s fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; obtuse, inscrutable storytelling for twenty minutes, til you just can’t take it anymore, and then the planets line up and a recognizable conflict is presented&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well  put. I like that about his films (not just the Decalogue). The way I see it you are thrown in the middle of a story and nothing is explained, not even who&#8217;s who exactly. You sort of have to piece it together. That&#8217;s why it seems so confusing and uneven at first. Maybe he assumes his viewers are smarter than average (as opposed to a CSI episode where everything the characters are doing is explained by&#8230;them)?</p>
<p>P.S. nothing against CSI, I actually like the show, it&#8217;s fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

