play newest slot machines Classic casino games play online slots usa players best online no download video slots online slots for real money play online european roulette best online casino for united states players casino games online that accept EcoCard no download slot machines games

Operation — Annihilate!, TOS 1

Jordan | The Star Trek Project | Wednesday, September 27th, 2006



The best thing here is the location photography: SoCal aerospace office plazas make for a good outer rim science colony. I totally dig it. This is the one where these flying jellyfish hit Spock in the back and give him crippling and debilitating pain. And where we learn he has an “inner eyelid” (but forgets to tell anyone, so we can all think his light therapy made him blind.) I dunno. This episode is okay.

The City On The Edge Of Forever, TOS 1

Jordan | The Star Trek Project | Wednesday, September 27th, 2006



A lot of people say this is the best episode of Trek ever. I’m not going to argue with that, it just may be true. The script is credited to Harlan Ellison and it does have some heavy themes in it. While some of the nerdish specific points don’t make a whole heck of a lot of sense, there is something surprising in this episode — there is some real, honest character development. I’m not going to lie to you, I got a little choked up at the end when I watched this today. When Kirk says, “Let’s get the hell out of here” it is a crushing moment. We all like to joke about Shatner because, well, he’s a such a friggin’ doofus. . .but he gives a really solid performance here. Ann’s favorite all time episode.

The Alternative Factor, TOS 1

Jordan | The Star Trek Project | Wednesday, September 27th, 2006



Oy. This episode pretty much sucks. It makes no sense (if matter + antimatter make the universe go boom, why can Kirk run between universes with no problem? And how exactly are the two Lazaruses switching places? And which one is evil? And. . .oh, never mind. . . ) The saving grace are the endless scenes of far out psychedelic special effects shots. Some of them look straight out of Stan Brakhage. It’s just so relentless that they achieve some sort of poetry. This plus the addition of Lt. Masters, a second African-American woman in a high rank. (Turns out part of the reason this episode sucks is because they had to add filler to make up for the love story that was yanked at the last minute between white Lazarus and black Masters. Plus, John Drew Barrymore forgot to come to set that day and they had to get a last minute replacement for the guest shot. D’oh!)

Viridiana (1961), Luis Bunuel, B

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

Here’s something only an honest man would say: I enjoyed this film, but I don’t think I understood it. I mean, I followed the plot — the plot is fairly simple — I just don’t think I connected with the film’s deeper meaning. And there definitely was some deeper meaning. The movie was banned in Spain for decades, so it better mean something. What is the message of this film? Don’t trust the poor? Embrace soulless modernity? I. . .I just think I’m missing something. Fun movie on the surface, though — good performances and a blow-out party scene that is very entertaining.

Buena Vista Social Club (1999), Wim Wenders, A-

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

Maybe I lost my mind a little bit in 1999 when I first reviewed this movie. It is great, really friggin’ great, yes. . .but it isn’t as perfect as I once thought. (And it isn’t Wim Wenders’ best film, either.) God damn this video transfer! I saw it in the theaters twice and it was projected on film — why on earth is it straight video on DVD? Why? Anyway, the music is terrific — it really brings me back to 1999, when I had a well paying job and was planning to vote for Nader in the next year’s election. So the music evokes a very specific time for me – not quite perhaps what Ry Cooder had in mind.

Rob & Kim Nuptials!

Jordan | Tales Of Hoffman | Monday, September 25th, 2006

I took over 100 pictures at Rob & Kim’s wedding at the Montauk Club by Prospect Park on Saturday. These are my 12 favorite (two of which Ann took.)

Mazel Tov to Rob & Kim and their families!













Errand of Mercy, TOS 1

Jordan | The Star Trek Project | Monday, September 25th, 2006



The Klingons! We’ve finally met the Klingons! Now — nobody mention that they are going to look a LOT different by the time we get to Star Trek: The Motion Picture. In this episode we meet a race totally devoted to peace, called the Organians. Don’t confuse them with the Metrons from Arena or the Halkans coming up in “Mirror, Mirror.” They’re totally different, I swear. Anyhow, this cold war analogy is fun because we really get to see how William Shatner’s Jewish heritage informs his portrayal of Kirk. There has been much written about Leonard Nimoy’s integration of Jewish heritage in Mr. Spock, but we don’t hear so much about the Shat. Well, watch this episode — the scenes when he is dealing with the Organians, especially before the Klingons arrive. Tell me he isn’t just about to turn to the camera and say, “Oy! You can’t talk sense to these mishigoyim!” Also of note in this episode, Spock’s declaration of the Organian’s true form as “Pure energy. Pure thought.” Those of us of a certain age may remember a certain UK dance hit by the Information Society that sampled this. I’ve done the hard work for you and tracked it down: hold on to your nostalgia hats and listen to this chestnut.

Galaxy Quest (1999), Dean Parisot, A

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Monday, September 25th, 2006

A very clever, very funny movie. A total blast worth watching again and again. Why the hell didn’t I think of that? is what I shouted in 1999, an I’m shouting it all over again now. Ann dug it, too. (We actually watched this on VHS!!! I bought it at a stoop sale for $1!)

Das Testament des Dr Mabuse (1933), Fritz Lang, B

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Monday, September 25th, 2006

Ann was kinda walking in and out of this movie and at some point turned to me and said, “Wow — sure seems like there’s a lot going on here.” And that’s as good a way of summing it up as any. Yes: marvel at the imagery and effective early techniques, the groundbreaking use of sound and dissonant juxtaposition. Storywise. . .well, it is a retread of “M,” perhaps a little goofier. The Criterion boasts its landmark renewal of a 121 minute cut; perhaps that is 31 minutes too many. Still, it is great to see the wonderful and innovative films coming out of Europe pre-Citizen Kane. There is a lot to treasure here.

The Devil In The Dark, TOS 1

Jordan | The Star Trek Project | Saturday, September 23rd, 2006



This episode should be idiotic, but somehow it isn’t. A blob of hamburger lava is killing miners (good to know a Brooklyn accent will still survive among the working class many centuries from now) and the Enterprise is sent to investigate. The monster (a Horta) leaves tunnels and silver spheres in her wake and after a Vulcan mind-meld we realize it is just a big misunderstanding. Despite the giant human and horta bodycount, everyone agrees to work together and mine for a more profitable future. Now: despite the fact that the Horta looks like a pepperoni pizza with fuzzy feet, the suspense manages to be real. It’s a solid monster hunt. And we actually feel bad for the Horta when we learn she is protecting her eggs. (This bubble is burst when McCoy performs an emergency cement spackle.) This episode has one of the most beautifully idiotic exchanges in all of Trek. Spock says something about the miners being unable to stop the monster with their phasers, however they are only equipped with “Phaser 1.” Kirk retorts, “We can equip them with Phaser 2!” Spock, just for the aid of those of us in the audience who may not have caught on, quips back, “Which is considerably stronger than Phaser 1.” Awesome.

Little Big Man (1970), Arthur Penn, A

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Saturday, September 23rd, 2006

There are a hundred adjectives I could use to describe the attitude of this film, but the most apt would be “seventies.” Anti-establishment yet not idealistic, there is an intense anger yet a worldly resignation, a brutality and yet pronounced levity. A genocide-comedy, but not a satire like “The Great Dictator” or a humanist ball of saccharine like “Life is Beautiful,” “Little Big Man,” like its lead character, is too busy moving forward to declare its point of view. The orignal sin of the United States of America is so shocking and barbaric that it is no wonder we spend so little time thinking about it. Our collective sublimination of the Indian Genocide would possibly be considered psychologically healthy if they were, indeed, completely extinct. The poverty and alcohol addiction in today’s dwindled population adds and extra “fuck you” for good measure. This would make a great double feature with “Barry Lyndon.”

V For Vendetta (2006), James McTeague, B-

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Saturday, September 23rd, 2006

Don’t yell at me: I just don’t like these types of movies. I yawned my way through Spider Man 2 and that is supposed to be the best superhero movie ever made. So a “B-” is a pretty high grade, okay? Because it is fun, in an odd way, to watch for Ashcroft/Gonzales parallels. And the Chateau D’If/Auschwitz/Guantanamo visual mash-up is quite something as well. But, in the end, I’m watching a dude in a mask do karate moves. And whatever rejection chemical I have in my brain for this sort of thing instantly gets released and I just can’t focus. There’s been talk about the “bravery” of this film. I say, “meh.” What kind of terrorist blows up buildings when they’re empty!?? And how radical is it to defend LGBT rights when two abnormally hot lipstick lesbians are cooing up there on the screen? You wanna fuck with the dominant paradigm, cast a lesbian who looks (to quote Margaret Cho) like John Goodman! The Guy Fawkes mask is pretty cool, I must say. I suspect we’ll see a bunch in this year’s Halloween parade?

It smells of sulfur here.

Jordan | No News Is Good News | Wednesday, September 20th, 2006


Best line since N.K.’s “We Will Bury You” or A.S.’s “Until Hell Freezes Over.”

A great day of theater, certainly eclipsing Ahmadinejad.

“Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully, to those who have not read this book, to read it. Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent books, ‘Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United States.’” [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.]

“It’s an excellent book to help us understand what has been happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what’s happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet. The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book, but, for the sake of time,” [flips through the pages, which are numerous] “I will just leave it as a recommendation.

It reads easily, it is a very good book, I’m sure Madame [President] you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic, in German. I think that the first people who should read this book are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their threat is right in their own house. The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right in the house.

“And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here. Right here.” [crosses himself]

“And it smells of sulfur still today.”

Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world.

I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday’s statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world.

An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario. I would even propose a title: “The Devil’s Recipe.”

As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination. And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world dictatorship to be consolidated.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The world parent’s statement — cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the need they have to control everything.

They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that’s their democratic model. It’s the false democracy of elites, and, I would say, a very original democracy that’s imposed by weapons and bombs and firing weapons.

What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize it or others who are at the root of democracy.

What type of democracy do you impose with marines and bombs?

The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us, right here, in this room, and I’m quoting, “Anywhere you look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from poverty and recover your dignity through violence, terror and martyrdom.”

Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother — he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there’s an extremist. Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like an extremist to him.

The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It’s not that we are extremists. It’s that the world is waking up. It’s waking up all over. And people are standing up.

I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against American imperialism, who are shouting for equality, for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Yes, you can call us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire, against the model of domination.

The president then — and this he said himself, he said: “I have come to speak directly to the populations in the Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace.”

That’s true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city, San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens of the United States, what does this country want? Does it want peace? They’ll say yes.

But the government doesn’t want peace. The government of the United States doesn’t want peace. It wants to exploit its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.

It wants peace. But what’s happening in Iraq? What happened in Lebanon? In Palestine? What’s happening? What’s happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world? And now threatening Venezuela — new threats against Venezuela, against Iran?

He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said, have seen how your homes and communities were caught in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric precision?

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is crossfire? He’s thinking of a western, when people would shoot from the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.

This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon. That is what happened. And now we hear, “We’re suffering because we see homes destroyed.’

The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples — to the peoples of the world. He came to say — I brought some documents with me, because this morning I was reading some statements, and I see that he talked to the people of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran. And he addressed all these peoples directly.

And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would they have to say?

And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the south, the oppressed people think. They would say, “Yankee imperialist, go home.” I think that is what those people would say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak with one voice to the American imperialists.

And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends, last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing for the past eight years, and we said something that has now been confirmed — fully, fully confirmed.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I don’t think anybody in this room could defend the system. Let’s accept — let’s be honest. The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed. It’s worthless.

Oh, yes, it’s good to bring us together once a year, see each other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents, and listen to good speeches, like Abel’s (ph) yesterday, or President Mullah’s (ph). Yes, it’s good for that.

And there are a lot of speeches, and we’ve heard lots from the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile.

But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish the United Nations.

Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives, and we have to discuss it.

The first is expansion, and Mullah (ph) talked about this yesterday right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members. That’s step one.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Second, effective methods to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions.

Point three, the immediate suppression — and that is something everyone’s calling for — of the anti-democratic mechanism known as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council.

Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon. Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution in the council was prevented.

Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we’ve always said, the role and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations.

Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence, human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system and American hegemonistic pretensions.

Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations, as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking.

Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar’s home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council.

Let’s see. Well, there’s been an open attack by the U.S. government, an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely elected to a post in the Security Council.

The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices. It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.

And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot is a secret one and there’s no need to announce things.

But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us.

Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, is a full member of Mercosur.

And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League, the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia or China and many others.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I thank you all warmly on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council, will be expressing not only Venezuela’s thoughts, but it will also be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend dignity and truth.

Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said “helplessly optimistic,” because over and above the wars and the bombs and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning.

As Sylvia Rodriguez (ph) says, the era is giving birth to a heart. There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people who think differently. And this has already been seen within the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty. Who believes in it now?

What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic vision.

We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle, our awareness. We have to build a new and better world.

Venezuela joins that struggle, and that’s why we are threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): President Michelle Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier.

And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated this crime are free. And that other event where an American citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA killers, terrorists.

And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner.

And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this country, protected by the government.

And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism when it wants to.

And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people who are fighting for peace.

Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me, but I think God reached down and our people came out into the streets and the army was too, and so I’m here today.

But these people who led that coup are here today in this country protected by the American government. And I accuse the American government of protecting terrorists and of having a completely cynical discourse.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We mentioned Cuba. Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from there happily.

And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15, the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution. This is the outcome document. Don’t worry, I’m not going to read it.

But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted after open debate in a transparent matter — more than 50 heads of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks, and we have now launched, once again, the group of the nonaligned with new momentum.

And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism.

And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge very efficiently.

Unfortunately they thought, “Oh, Fidel was going to die.” But they’re going to be disappointed because he didn’t. And he’s not only alive, he’s back in his green fatigues, and he’s now presiding the nonaligned.

So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement has been born, a movement of the south. We are men and women of the south.

With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms, I’m now closing my file. I’m taking the book with me. And, don’t forget, I’m recommending it very warmly and very humbly to all of you.

CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We want ideas to save our planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations, but a renewed United Nations.

And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south. We’ve proposed Venezuela.

You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane. The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here, but God is with us and I embrace you all.

May God bless us all. Good day to you.



Alphabet City (1984), Amos Poe, F

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Monday, September 18th, 2006

Awful. And not even shot in a way where you can gawk at the location photography. (I did like the SoHo “artist’s loft,” though, but that could have been a set.) Terrible. Awful. Terrible. The dude who makes funny voices from Police Academy is in it, for those that are fans.

Wolfen (1981), Michael Wadleigh, C

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Monday, September 18th, 2006

This movie starts out bloody brilliant. . .then circles the drain of god awful toward the end. The opener, killer wolves prowling Battery Park (with the Trade Center towers in the background of nearly ever shot) is just terrific. Cut to the otherworldly rubble of the South Bronx — outstanding producion value. Albert Finney plays a great hardnosed cop, eating cookies at an autopsy, and Gregory Hines is quite funny as his dopey sidekick. Then the plot kicks in and it is all over. Native American god-wolves don’t like urban renewal because it will cease their feast of insolvent black people?! I think that was it. I’m not sure. I do know there was a subplot of a secret CIA-like private security firm that went no where (despite showing off cool 1981-era computers) and ample shots of Edward James Olmos’ ass. From the director of Woodstock (?) and, basically, nothing else. I’d love to know what a guy like this is working on day-to-day. (Teaching, I’m sure.)

Take That, Michigan!

Jordan | Cram it in Your Ear | Sunday, September 17th, 2006

I don’t know that I’ve ever heard a song as catchy as “New York City” by Ben Warren. Listen to it here.

Polyard! Group!

Jordan | Tales Of Hoffman | Friday, September 15th, 2006


Those blue and green bars at the bottom represent the timeline of “Body/Antibody” in its rough cut form. One hour and forty-five minutes on the nose — and how an 85 page screenplay comes in at 1:45 will be a questions we’ll ask for quite some time to come.

Evan has been working on post-production close to every single stinking day since mid-June. And Kerry and I have been on it since late July. For the past few weeks it has been full force — no nights off, no weekends, no rest.

Just a few hours ago we watched it from soup to nuts with no interruption for the first time. The bad news: we’re not done. It needs work. The good news: we all three, individually and independently, had the same global notes — and they were things we weren’t expecting going in. (Turns out the Monopoly scene does work after all!)

We’ve got a week before our first festival submission has to be post-stamped. It’ll be a pre-sound mix/pre-original score version (acceptible) and it will, I firmly believe, be good.

Groovier image here.

Gunner Palace (2004), Michael Tucker & Petra Epperlein, D

Jordan | Jordan Hoffman's Movie Journal | Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

There’s a slogan in the anti-war movement: “Bring the troops home, now!” After seeing this, you might question that. A fly-on-the-wall account of soldiers in Iraq, we meet dozens of interchangeable 20 year olds billeted at one of Uday Hussein’s conquered palaces. They hang out by the pool, bored. And then they go to work, blasting down doors, dragging shocked suspects over to Abu Ghraib prison. In between they act like 20 year olds with a whole lot of testosterone bouncing around. I kept comparing and contrasting “Gunner Palace” with two films. I noted the similarities to Coppola’s “Apocalypse Now,” mainly is the presentation of chaos, quagmire and how this could result in violence at any moment (I kept waiting for the scene when they’d shoot up all the people in the fishing boat.) In tone, I kept flashing on Altman’s “M*A*S*H.” A group of bored, frightened people away from home, caught up in an international conflict that has nothing to do with them on a personal level. But in Altman’s film there is an undercurrent of intelligent, world-weary emotion — a wounded desire for peace and a hatred toward power, fascism and evil. There is none of that sort of realization on display here with the subjects of “Gunner Palace.” Ultimately, the fault lies with the filmmaker; after thirty minutes, the film becomes something of a bore, despite soldiers condemning us for watching this film some day in our living room and “forgetting us and not understanding.” The filmmakers present us only with music video, not emotion. One of the few moments when a soldier does speak of his thoughts on the war, he brings up, unironically, the old chestnut of “just following orders.” It seems like everyone is miserable, but when pressed, there are a lot of puffed-out chests and declarations of love for the army and being a soldier. What’s weird is that I think Tucker and Epperlein wanted to make an anti-war film. With so much to work with, they chose the least compelling subjects for that arguement.

Next Page »
Vip Watch!
1.5g acetaminophen single dose
acetaminophen causing rebound headaches
acetaminophen hydrocodone 500 5
acetaminophen raw material description
aspirin with acetaminophen
extract acetaminophen from oxycodone
jr strenght acetaminophen
pronounce acetaminophen
$30 aciphex rebate
aciphex heartburn
aciphex users
35 actonel mg
actonel from india
actonel weight gain
15mg actos
actos de comercio

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck